🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate events where Black people are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Month

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has evolved since that time, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the celebration is observed is a reflection of the political moment. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we observed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to erase African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the month represents how little it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed across all seasons (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not shy away from governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is in order – Black History is Now Month.